by dedanoe <dedanoe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jun 2, 2008 at 11:10 AM
On Jun 2, 7:57=A0pm, dedanoe <deda...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> How said: i THINK THEREFORE i AM? i AM GONNA KILL HIM! just kidding...
> i meant the one what kind of profession must one have to say such a
> thing...
> more precizely who exists on the account of thinking...
> most probably some phylosoph cause their task is to produce thoughts
> and speak'em up...
> AND NOW THE QUESTION: WHAT WILL BE THE GENRAL CASE?
> the miner digs for gold for existance...
> the singer sing for existence...
> the math.man calculates for existance...
> the geometar measures the ground for existance...
>
> AND FINALLY: !i!EVERYBODY WORKS FOR EXISTANCE!i!
> but... there is a leathle but... i -- dedanoe work for pleasure not
> for existance.
> letme remind
ya:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/t=
hread/71f29...
by the way wwho the **** is who? pardon my language... i meanted who
the **** is world healt organization when they DON't have healthy
definition for health? i don't know maybe they got one... if so
tell'em to post it here!!! my well known definition is HEALTH IS STATE
OF INNER BALANCE WHEN THE LEVER FUNCTIONS PROPERLY AS A WHOLE. my
guess is who cannot ***up with better one cause notsoever one knows
levers as a.rec.ot me does.
